Cochrane reviews in pregnancy: The role of perinatal randomized trials and systematic reviews in establishing evidence

References 

1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal. 1996;312(7023):71–72
2. Guyatt G, Rennie DE. Users' Guide to the Medical Literature. A manual for evidence based practice. JAMA and Archives Journals, The American Medical Associations; 2002;
3. Cochrane A. Effectiveness and efficiency. Random reflections on health services. The Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; 1972;
4. Chalmers I, Hetherington J, Newdick M, Mutch L, Grant A, Enkin M, et al. The Oxford database of perinatal trials: developing a register of published reports of controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986;7:306–324
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Enkin M, Keirse M, Chalmers I. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989;
6. Enkin M, Keirse M, Chalmers IE. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989;
7. The Cochrane Library. 2005; Issue 3. www3.interscience.wiley.com.
8. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Renfrew M, Neilson JP, Chalmers ICE. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995;
9. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson JP, Crowther CA, Duley L, Hodnett ED, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000;
10. National Health and Medical Research Council . How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2005;
11. National Institute of Clinical Excellence . Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: RCOG Press; 2003;
12. National Institute of Clinical Excellence . Caesarean section. London: RCOG Press; 2004;
13. Guise JM, McDonagh M, Hashima J, Karaemer DF, Eden KB, Berlin M, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Evidence report/technology assessment: number 71. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003;
14. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). British Medical Journal. 1997;315:672–675
15. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence based medicine. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 1997;
16. Sacks HS, Berrier J, Reitman D, Ancona-Berk VA, Chalmers TC. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. New England Journal of Medicine. 1987;316:450–455
17. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal. 1994;309:597–599
18. Thacker SB. Meta-analysis: a quantitative approach to research integration. JAMA. 1998;259:1685–1689
    • MEDLINE
19. Chalmers I, Hetherington J, Elbourne D, Keirse M, Enkin M. Materials and methods used in synthesizing evidence to evaluate the effects of care during pregnancy and childbirth. In:  Chalmers I,  Enkin M,  Keirse M editor. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989;
20. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: assessing the methodological quality of published papers. British Medical Journal. 1997;315:305–308
21. Neilson JE. Evidence based obstetrics. London: Elselvier; 2005;
22. Wilson B, Thornton JG, Hewison J, Lilford RJ, Watt I, Braunholtz D, et al. The Leeds University maternity audit project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2002;14(3):175–181
23. Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 2005;
24. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, Hewson SA, Milner R, Willan AR. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian Mulitcenter Post-term Pregnancy Trial Group. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992;326(24):1587–1592
25. Donoghue D, Bawden K, Cartwright D, Darlow B, Henderson-Smart D, Lancaster P. The report of the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network, 2000. Sydney: ANZNN; 2002;
26. Phipps H, Roberts CL, Nassar N, Raynes-Greenow CH, Peat B, Hutton EK. The management of breech pregnancies in Australia and New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;43(4):294–297
27. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Evidence-based clinical guideline number 8: the use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: RCOG Press; 2001;
28. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Evidence-based clinical guideline number 9: induction of labour. London: RCOG Press; 2002;
29. Government of South Australia . South Australian perinatal guidelines. 2005;
30. The Eclampsia Trial Collaborative Group. Which anticonvulsant for women with eclampsia? Evidence from the Collaborative Eclampsia Trial. Lancet. 1995;345:1455–1463
    • Abstract
31. Altman D, Carroli G, Duley L, Farrell B, Moodley J, Neilson J, et al. Do women with pre-eclampsia and their babies benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;359:1877–1890
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (156 KB)
    • CrossRef
32. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. The Term Breech Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–1383
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (114 KB)
    • CrossRef
33. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Haslam RR for the Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium Sulphate (ACTOMgSO4) Collaborative Group. Effect of magnesium sulphate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2669–2676
    • CrossRef
34. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS for the Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352(24):2477–2486
35. Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson S, Hodnett ED, Willan AR. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. New England Journal of Medicine. 1996;334(16):1005–1010
36. The ACTOBAT Collaborative Group. Australian collaborative trial of antenatal thyrotrpin-releasing hormone (ACTOBAT) for prevention of neonatal respiratory disease. Lancet. 1995;345:877–882
    • Abstract
    • CrossRef
37. www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/search.asp2005;
38. www.ctc.usyd.edu.au/6registry/impactreport.htm2005;
39. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct/gui2005;