Developing primary and secondary services for drug and alcohol dependent mothers

References 

1. Boyd S. From witches to crack moms: Women, drug law, and policy. NC: Carolina Academic Press; 2004;
2. Weber M. The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: George Allen & Unwin; 1976;
3. Hunt A. Governing morals: A social history of moral regulation. Cambridge University Press; 1999;
4. Valverde M. The age of light, soap, and water: Moral reform in English Canada 1885–1925. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart/Oxford; 1991;
5. In:  Musto D editors. Drugs in America: A documentary history. New York: Routledge; 2002;
6. Plant M. Alcohol and its effects: drinking during pregnancy. In:  Plant M,  Cameron D editor. The alcohol report. London: Free Association Press; 2000;p. 34–38
7. Schellenberg C. What knowledge and whose knowing counts? Fetal alcohol syndrome examined. Visions Journal. 2006;2(9):12–14
8. Armstrong E. Diagnosing moral disorder: The discovery and evolution of fetal alcohol syndrome. Social Science and Medicine. 1998;47(12):2025–2042
9. Armstrong E. Conceiving risk, bearing responsibility: Fetal alcohol syndrome & the diagnosis of moral disorder. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003;
10. Mayes L, Granger R, Bornstein M, et al. The problem of prenatal cocaine exposure. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992;267(3):406–408
11. Morgan J, Zimmer L. The social pharmacology of smokeable cocaine: Not all it's cracked up to be. In:  Reinarman C,  Levine L editor. Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1997;p. 131–170
12. Paltrow L. The war on drugs and the war on abortion: Some initial thoughts on the connections, intersections and the effects. Southern University Law Review. 2001;28(3):201–253
13. Greaves L, Varcoe C, Poole N, et al. A Motherhood issue: Discourses on mothering under duress. Ottawa: Status of women in Canada; 2002;
14. Humphries D. Crack mothers: Pregnancy, drugs, and the media. Columbus: Ohio State University Press; 1999;
15. Arendt R, et al. Top medical doctors and scientists urge major media outlets to stop perpetuating ‘crack baby’ myth. Online. Available at: http://www.jointogether.org/sa/files/pdf/sciencenotstigma.pdf [accessed 20 April 2004].
16. Goldberg D, Abrahamson D, Waldman A. Amici Curiae Ferguson V., The City of Charleston, South Carolina, No. 99–936, U.S. Supreme Court, 1–30; 1999.
17. Murphy S, Rosenbaum M. Pregnant women on drugs: Combating stereotypes and stigma. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1999;
18. Center for Reproductive Law and Policy . Punishing women for their behavior during pregnancy. Fact sheet. New York: Center for Reproductive Law and Policy; February 1996;
19. Paltrow L, Cohen D, Carey C. Governmental responses to pregnant women who use alcohol and other drugs: Year 2000 overview. Online. Available at http://www.advocatesforpregnantwomen.org/articles/gov_response_review.pdf2003;[accessed 12March 2003]
20. Taylor D. Does a foetus have more rights than its mother? The Guardian. Online. Available at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/women/story/0,3604,1201291,00html [accessed 23 April 2004].
21. Boyd S. Mothers and illicit drugs: Transcending the myths. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1999;
22. Roberts D. Shattered Bonds: The color of child welfare. New York: Basic Civitas Books; 2002;
23. Buchanan J, Young L. Child protection: social worker's views. In:  Klee H,  Jackson M,  Lewis S editor. Drug misuse and motherhood. London: Routledge; 2002;p. 195–210
24. Colten M. A comparison of heroin-addicted and non-addicted mothers: Their attitudes, beliefs, and parenting experiences. In: Heroin-addicted parents and their children: Two reports. National Institute on Drug Abuse Services Research Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service; Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration; 1980;p. 1–18
25. Dreher M, Nugent J, Hudgins R. Prenatal marijuana exposure and neonatal outcomes in Jamaica: an ethnographic study. Pediatrics. 1994;93(2):254–260
    • MEDLINE
26. Leeders F. Drug-addicted parents and their children. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1992;3(4):204–210
27. Sterk-Elifson C. Just for fun? Cocaine use among middle-class women. Journal of Drug Issues. 1996;26(1):63–76
28. Sowder B, Burt M. Children of addicts and nonaddicts: A comparative investigation in five urban sites. In: Heroin-addicted parents and their children: Two reports. National Institute on Drug Abuse Services Research Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; Public Health Service: Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental health Administration; 1980;p. 19–35
29. State of South Carolina v. Regina D. McKnight, No. 00-GS-26–0432, 00-GS-26-3330, S.C. Court of General Sessions; May 14–16, 2001.
30. National Advocates for Pregnant Women. Annual report. New York: Authors; 2004.
31. Hepburn M. Drug use in pregnancy. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 1993;49(1):51–55
    • MEDLINE
32. Hepburn M. Providing care for pregnant women who use drugs: The Glasgow Women's Reproductive Health Service. In:  Klee H,  Jackson M,  Lewis S editor. Drug misuse and motherhood. London: Routledge; 2002;p. 250–260
33. Hirsch A. Some days are harder than hard: Welfare reform and women with drug convictions in Pennsylvania. New York: Center for Law and Social Policy; 1999;
34. Hurman T. April 26. Protesters defend abortion rights. The Globe and Mail. 2004;A9
35. Hepburn M., Providing services to substance using mothers and their babies. Paper presented at the Justice Institute of British Columbia, New Westminister, BC; 1999.
36. Macrory F. Maternal Drug Use and Pregnancy Audit 1992–93. St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester. Unpublished; 1994 [Available from F. Macrory].
37. Macrory F, Crosby S. Special care or segregation? The need for improvement in the provision of maternity services for drug using women. Unpublished; 1995 [Available from F. Macrory].
38. DoH . Modernising health and social services: the national priorities guidance for 2001–2003. London: The Stationary Office; 2000;
39. Tudor Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971;1:405–412
    • CrossRef
40. DoH . Saving lives—our healthier nation. London: The Stationary Office; 1999;
41. Do H. Changing childbirth: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. London: The Stationary Office; 1993;
42. Hirst J, Eisner M. Narrowing the gap: social class, age and ethnic differences in maternity outcomes. In:  Marsh G,  Renfrew M editor. Community-based maternity care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999;
43. Audit Commission . First class delivery: a national survey of women's views on maternity care. Oxford: Audit Commission Publishers; 1998;
44. DoH . Making a difference: Strengthening the nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and healthcare. London: The Stationary Office; 1999;
45. NHSE (NHS Executive) . Guidance on Establishing consultant posts and making appointments (HSC 1999/217). Leeds: HSC; 1999;
46. Robinson E. Director of Manchester, Salford and Trafford HAZ; presentation to the Primary care Leadership Programme. Manchester Centre for Health Care Management, University of Manchester; 2000;
47. Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths (CEMD) . Why mothers die 1997–1999. The fifth confidential enquiry into maternal deaths. London: RCOG Press; 2001;
48. Department of Health . National Service Framework for Young People. Children and Maternity Services (Standard 11). London: DH Publications; 2004;
49. Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs(ACMD) . Hidden harm: Responding to the needs of children of problem drug users. The report of an Inquiry by the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs. Online. Available at http://www.drugs.gov.uk2003;
50. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) . Why mothers die 2000–2002. The sixth report of confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. London: RCOG Press; 2004;
51. Department of Health . Women's mental health: into the mainstream. Strategic development of mental health care for women. London: DoH publications; 2002;
52. Department of Health . Mental health policy implementation guide: dual diagnosis good practice guide. www.doh.gov.uk/mentalhealth/dualdiagnosis.htm2002;
53. Bureau Regional du Centre Parlementaire (BRCP) . Guidelines for perinatal care of substance using women and their infants. Vancouver, BC: Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia; 1999;
54. Baldacchino A, Riglietta M, Corkery J. Maternal health and drug abuse: perspectives across Europe. Denmark: European Collaborating Centres in Addiction Studies (ECCAS); 2003;
55. Thajam D, Carroll H. Guidelines for working with pregnant drug and/or alcohol using women. Manchester, UK: Manchester Specialist Midwifery Service (MSMS); 2006;
56. National Treatment Agency (NTA) . Models of care for the treatment of adult drug misusers, framework for developing local systems of effective drug misuse treatment in England. London: NTA; 2002;
57. Standing Conference on Drug Abuse (SCODA) Drug Using parents and their children: the second report of the National Local Authority Forum on Drug Abuse in conjunction with SCODA. London: Association of Metropolitan Authorities; 1989. In: Drug use, pregnancy and care of the newborn; 1997. Available from Macrory F, Manchester.
58. Weir A. An introduction to the issues: a new holistic approach outlined. In:  Douglas A,  Weir A editor. Child protection and adult mental health: conflict of interest?. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann Press; 1999;[Chapter 1]
59. Beck-Sander A. Working with parents with mental health problems: management of the many risks. In:  Douglas A,  Weir A editor. Child protection and adult mental health: conflict of interest?. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann Press; 1999;Chapter 8
60. In:  Douglas A,  Weir A editor. Child Protection and Adult Mental Health: Conflict of Interest?. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann Press; 1999;
61. Fearnley S, Howe D. Disorders of attachment and attachment therapy. Adoption and Fostering. 1999;23(2):19–30
62. Ministry for Children and Families(MCF) . Integrated case management. Vancouver, BC: MCF; 1998;
63. Weaver S. Shame reduction: Best practice with substance-using mothers. MSW thesis. Vancouver, BC: School of Social Work and Family Studies, University of British Columbia; 1993.
64. Poole N, Dell CA. Girls, women and substance use. Vancouver/Ottawa: British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women's Health/Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2005;