Advertisement

Usability of human-computer interaction in neonatal care

  • Kevin R Dufendach
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of Biomedical Informatics, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, USA

    Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA

    Division of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adriana Navarro-Sainz
    Affiliations
    School of Information, University of Cincinnati, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kristen LW Webster
    Affiliations
    Patient Safety, Regulatory, & Accreditation, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, USA
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 12, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2022.101395

      Highlights

      • Incorporating human-computer interaction usability principles in medical system design can improve quality, efficiency, and safety in healthcare delivery.
      • Poor usability of electronic health record systems is associated with increased burnout among clinicians.
      • Specific foci for improving usability in neonatology include prenatal care, delivery room resuscitation, routine newborn care, interhospital transfers, nutrition and fluids, complex medication management, and documentation.
      • Strategies for optimizing the visualization of neonatal nutrition, fluid, and medication administration data
      • Use of data analytics methods, including machine learning and natural language processing, to analyze neonatal data and facilitate clinical decision support
      • Methods to communicate important maternal health information that affects the infant's care while still supporting maternal health privacy
      • Strategies to support a shared neonatal team workflow that encourages a shared mental model and decreased duplicate documentation.

      Abstract

      While a goal for Electronic Health Record (EHR) technologies was to improve quality, efficiency, and safety, the usability of EHRs has remained poor. The relation to patient harm and user satisfaction cannot be ignored. Optimization of EHR usability is imperative to improving the outcomes for critically ill patients, especially neonates who are at the extremes of physiologic variability. Further development and integration of metadata with predictive modeling and clinical protocols can support provider decision making, increase efficiency and safety, and reduce clinician burnout. This paper reviews EHR usability and identifies opportunities to improve the EHR specific to neonatal care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Percent of hospitals, by type, that possess certified health IT | HealthIT.gov.
        (Accessed)
        • Lehmann C.U.
        • O'Connor K.G.
        • Shorte V.A.
        • Johnson T.D.
        Use of electronic health record systems by office-based pediatricians.
        Pediatrics. 2015; 135: e7-e15https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1115
      2. Committee on patient safety and health information technology, Institute of medicine. Health IT and patient safety: building safer systems for better care. National Academies Press (US), 2011
        http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK189661/
        Date accessed: February 9, 2022
        (Accessed)
        • Middleton B.
        • Bloomrosen M.
        • Dente M.A.
        • et al.
        Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA.
        J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2013; 20: e2-e8https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001458
        • Keene D.J.
        • Lamb S.E.
        • Mistry D.
        • et al.
        Electronic health record usability issues and potential contribution to patient harm.
        JAMA. 2018; 319: 1276-1278
        • International Organization for Standards
        ISO 9241-210:2010. Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO/IEC 9241-11.
        (Published online 1998) (Accessed)
        • Yamada N.
        • Catchpole K.
        • Salas E.
        The role of human factors in neonatal patient safety.
        Semin Perinatol. 2019; 43151174https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2019.08.003
        • Ratwani R.M.
        • Savage E.
        • Will A.
        • et al.
        Identifying electronic health record usability and safety challenges in pediatric settings.
        Health Aff. 2018; 37: 1752-1759https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0699
        • Gray J.E.
        • Safran C.
        • Davis R.B.
        • et al.
        Baby CareLink: using the internet and telemedicine to improve care for high-risk infants.
        Pediatrics. 2000; 106: 1318-1324https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.106.6.1318
        • Jackson L.E.
        • Bishop C.E.
        • Vats K.R.
        • Azzuqa A.A.
        Meeting families where they are: institution, evaluation, and sustainability of telemedicine prenatal neonatology consultation in the COVID-19 pandemic health emergency.
        Semin Perinatol. 2021; 45151417https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151417
        • Scandurra I.
        • Hägglund M.
        • Koch S.
        From user needs to system specifications: multi-disciplinary thematic seminars as a collaborative design method for development of health information systems.
        J Biomed Inf. 2008; 41: 557-569https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.01.012
        • Hettinger A.Z.
        • Melnick E.R.
        • Ratwani R.M.
        Advancing electronic health record vendor usability maturity: progress and next steps.
        J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2021; 28: 1029-1031https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa329
        • Ratwani R.M.
        • Fairbanks R.J.
        • Hettinger A.Z.
        • Benda N.C.
        Electronic health record usability: analysis of the user-centered design processes of eleven electronic health record vendors.
        J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2015; 22: 1179-1182https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv050
        • Sauro J.
        A practical guide to the system usability scale: background, benchmarks & best practices.
        Createspace Independent Publishing Platform, 2011
        • Affairs As for P
        System usability scale (SUS).
        (Published September 6, 2013) (Accessed)
        • Rauterberg M.
        About a method to measure the ergonomic quality of user interfaces in a task independent way. Workshop on emerging Technologies in human engineering Testing and evaluation NATO research study group 24, human engineering Testing and evaluation.
        1997 (Published online)
        • Remy C.
        • Bates O.
        • Dix A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation beyond usability: validating sustainable HCI research.
        in: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018: 1-14https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173790
        Date accessed: March 29, 2022
        (Accessed)
        • Rieman J.
        • Franzke M.
        • Redmiles D.
        Usability evaluation with the cognitive walkthrough.
        in: Conference Companion on human Factors in computing systems. CHI ’95. Association for Computing Machinery, 1995: 387-388https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223735
        • Experience WL in RBU
        Usability 101: introduction to usability. Nielsen norman group.
        (Accessed)
        • Shawgi E.
        • Noureldien N.A.
        Usability measurement model (UMM): a new model for measuring websites usability.
        Int J Inf Sci. 2015; 5: 5-13
        • Ferrara G.
        • Kim J.
        • Lin S.
        • Hua J.
        • Seto E.
        A focused review of smartphone diet-tracking apps: usability, functionality, coherence with behavior change theory, and comparative validity of nutrient intake and energy estimates.
        JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7e9232https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9232
        • Ellsworth M.A.
        • Lang T.R.
        • Pickering B.W.
        • Herasevich V.
        Clinical data needs in the neonatal intensive care unit electronic medical record.
        BMC Med Inf Decis Making. 2014; 14: 92https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-92
        • Palma J.P.
        • Brown P.J.
        • Lehmann C.U.
        • Longhurst C.A.
        Neonatal Informatics: optimizing clinical data entry and display.
        NeoReviews. 2012; 13: 81-85
        • Campbell R.J.
        The five rights of clinical decision support: CDS tools helpful for meeting meaningful use.
        Journal of AHIMA. 2013; 84 (web version updated February 2016): 42-47
        • Lytle K.S.
        • Westra B.L.
        • Whittenburg L.
        • et al.
        Information models offer value to standardize electronic health record flowsheet data: a fall prevention exemplar.
        J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021; 53: 306-314https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12646
        • Brannick M.T.
        • Roach R.M.
        • Salas E.
        Understanding team performance: a multimethod study.
        Hum Perform. 1993; 6: 287-308https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0604_1
        • Sweet L.E.
        • Moulaison H.L.
        Electronic health records data and metadata: challenges for big data in the United States.
        Big Data. 2013; 1: 245-251https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2013.0023
        • Gupta A.
        • Liu T.
        • Crick C.
        Utilizing time series data embedded in electronic health records to develop continuous mortality risk prediction models using hidden Markov models: a sepsis case study.
        Stat Methods Med Res. 2020; 29: 3409-3423https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280220929045
        • Zeng Z.
        • Zhao Y.
        • Sun M.
        • Vo A.H.
        • Starren J.
        • Luo Y.
        Rich text formatted EHR narratives – a hidden and ignored trove.
        Stud Health Technol Inf. 2019; 264: 472-476https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190266
        • Castaneda C.
        • Nalley K.
        • Mannion C.
        • et al.
        Clinical decision support systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine.
        J Clin Bioinf. 2015; 5: 4https://doi.org/10.1186/s13336-015-0019-3
        • Collier R.
        Electronic health records contributing to physician burnout.
        CMAJ (Can Med Assoc J). 2017; 189: E1405-E1406https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-5522
        • Downing N.L.
        • Bates D.W.
        • Longhurst C.A.
        Physician burnout in the electronic health record era: are we ignoring the real cause?.
        Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169: 50-51https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0139
        • Fang J.L.
        • Carey W.A.
        • Lang T.R.
        • Lohse C.M.
        • Colby C.E.
        Real-time video communication improves provider performance in a simulated neonatal resuscitation.
        Resuscitation. 2014; 85: 1518-1522https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.07.019
        • Thiessard F.
        • Mougin F.
        • Diallo G.
        • et al.
        RAVEL: retrieval and visualization in electronic health records.
        in: Quality of life through quality of information. IOS Press, 2012: 194-198
        • O'Connor S.
        • Waite M.
        • Duce D.
        • O'Donnell A.
        • Ronquillo C.
        Data visualization in health care: the Florence effect.
        J Adv Nurs. 2020; 76: 1488-1490https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14334
        • Rahman A.
        • Komiak S.
        An application of data visualization in electronic health records.
        JMISE. 2020; 7https://doi.org/10.15640/jmise.v7n2a1
        • Ceccarini C.
        HCI methodologies and Data Visualization to foster user awareness.
        2021 (Published online)
        • Noon CE D.P.
        Spatial data visualization in healthcare: supporting a facility location decision via GIS-based market analysis.
        in: Proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences. IEEE Computer Society., 2001: 10
        • Rostamzadeh N.
        • Abdullah S.S.
        • Sedig K.
        Data-driven activities involving electronic health records: an activity and task analysis framework for interactive visualization tools.
        Multimodal Technol Interaction. 2020; 4
        • Roitsch C.M.
        • Patricia K.E.
        • Hagan J.L.
        • Arnold J.L.
        • Sundgren N.C.
        Tablet-Based decision support tool improves performance of neonatal resuscitation: a randomized trial in simulation.
        Simul Healthc. 2020; 15: 243-250https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000422
        • Fang J.
        Use of telemedicine to support neonatal resuscitation.
        Semi Perinatol. 2021; 45151423
        • Stefanescu B.M.
        • Gillam-Krakauer M.
        • Stefanescu A.R.
        • Markham M.
        • Kosinski J.L.
        Very low birth weight infant care: adherence to a new nutrition protocol improves growth outcomes and reduces infectious risk.
        Early Hum Dev. 2016; 94: 25-30https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2016.01.011
        • Jasani B.
        • Patole S.
        Standardized feeding regimen for reducing necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants: an updated systematic review.
        J Perinatol. 2017; 37: 827-833https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2017.37
        • Dougherty D.
        • Nash A.
        Bar coding from breast to baby: a comprehensive breast milk management system for the NICU.
        Neonatal Netw. 2009; 28: 321-328https://doi.org/10.1891/0730-0832.28.5.321
        • O'Donnell H.C.
        • Suresh S.
        • Council On Clinical Information Technology
        Electronic documentation in pediatrics: the rationale and functionality requirements.
        Pediatrics. 2020; 146 (0)https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1684
        • Siegler E.L.
        • Adelman R.
        Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records.
        Am J Med. 2009; 122: 495-496https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.02.010
        • Bonamici S.
        21st Century Cures act. vol. 34. 2016 (Accessed)
        • Ratwani RM
        • Benda NC
        • Hettinger AZ
        • Fairbanks RJ
        Electronic health record vendor adherence to usability certification requirements and testing standards.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1070-1071